And don't bother saying CoD Advanced Warfare actually tried doing something different. I got nothing against Far Cry, Call of Duty or WoW I've actually played those games and enjoyed them. No? Screw that we just want the same old stuff every time? It's really disappointing to see that coming from the people who are responsible for setting the example of what good games are. Games that take chances and go above the norm to bring something new to the table. we should be rewarding games that actually try do something different.

So why go so harsh on indie games and give the cookie cutter vanilla games that never change a damn thing showing other gaming companies 'hey if it ain't broke don't fix it' when the truth is. and these are people who actually know the game and most have played since Vanilla WoW so obviously their knowledge on the subject surpasses critics who pick it up do a few raids than move on to their reviews. wait a minute, Metacritics you really like 85 don't you? Despite that score the WoW fans went on to say some of the expansions weren't all that great. 168 positives, 75 mixed and 180 negatives says something guys. Remember Far Cry 2? You gave that an 85 despite the entire gaming community showing up on that page to tell Metacritics how wrong they were. You give Call of Duty Advanced Warfare an 83? SSX received nearly a perfect score. angered to see this game with a 66 next to it. Of course it all comes down to speculation and opinion but honestly I'm shocked. And surprisingly my 120,000 subscribers agreed after they saw the playthrough or just played it themselves. and I'm surely not speaking for anyone else here but, I gave this Game of Year for 2014.

and I'm surely not speaking for anyone else here This may not be coming from someone who writes for IGN or any major gaming media sites. This may not be coming from someone who writes for IGN or any major gaming media sites.

Among the sleep play download